2014 Rolls-Royce Phantom
Independent review & score by Carivo
Independent review & score by Carivo
| Engine | 6.7L 12-Cylinder |
|---|---|
| Transmission | Automatic (S8) |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Premium |
| City / Hwy MPG | 11 / 19 MPG |
| Combined MPG | 14 MPG |
| Est. Annual Fuel Cost | $5,850 |
| CO₂ Emissions | 638 g/mi |
| Seating Capacity | 4 passengers |
| Body Style | Sedan |
| Base Price | $266,000–$338,660 |
Source: EPA FuelEconomy.gov & manufacturer data. Figures reflect base trim; actual specs vary by trim level.
The 2014 Rolls-Royce Phantom is a sedan that earns a Carivo score of 6.5/10 — rated Good. Its strongest dimension is Technology at 9.1/10, while Value at 4.3/10 is where it trails the competition most noticeably. It's a capable but unexceptional sedan — stronger alternatives exist if you're willing to shop the segment carefully.
Reliability and safety are the two dimensions that matter most for long-term ownership costs. At 5.7/10 for reliability, this sedan trails its segment. That doesn't rule it out, but go in with eyes open on running costs. Safety lands at 7.9/10 — solid, though some rivals offer more advanced driver-assist features as standard. Confirm official results for your trim at nhtsa.gov/ratings.
Performance at 6.1/10 is a genuine liability and a score that should factor heavily into any buying decision. The powertrain and chassis dynamics trail class rivals by a meaningful margin — don't overlook it. On technology it rates 9.1/10: a modern, well-integrated suite that compares favorably with anything at this price point.
Priced from $266,000–$338,660, 10 MPG, seating 4, the Rolls-Royce Phantom sits in the luxury tier of the sedan market. The value score of 4.3/10 is a red flag — comparable alternatives offer meaningfully more for the same outlay. Shop the segment before deciding. At 12 years old, resale value, parts availability, and whether a successor model has improved on its weak points are all worth investigating before committing.
Verdict: The 2014 Rolls-Royce Phantom sits in the middle of the field. Until its performance and reliability and value scores improve, stronger options exist at this price. Worth a look if it fits a specific need; otherwise use our compare tool against the segment leaders first.
Carivo scores are our own editorial assessment, informed by NHTSA safety and recall records, EPA fuel-economy figures, and manufacturer-published specifications. Scores are reviewed periodically and updated when new data becomes available. See our full methodology →
The 2014 Rolls-Royce Phantom ranks #1275 of 1310 sedans in the Carivo database — better than 3% of the segment. Its 6.5/10 overall score is 1 points below the segment average of 7.5/10. Its $266,000 starting price is about 862% above the segment's median of $27,664.
Rankings are recalculated as new vehicles and scores are added. See the full Sedan ranking →
Smart-money pick: the 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom scores 6.3/10 — within striking distance of the 2014's 6.5 — and starts roughly $23,000 lower. If you don't need the newest model year, that's money better spent on a higher trim or kept in your pocket.
| Year | Score | Starting price (MSRP when new) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6.5/10 | $266,000 | Read review → |
| 2014 (this review) | 6.5/10 | $266,000 | |
| 2013 | 6.3/10 | $254,600 | Read review → |
| 2012 | 6.3/10 | $243,200 | Read review → |
We rate the 2014 Rolls-Royce Phantom's reliability 5.7/10 — below the segment average, so budget for higher maintenance.
It scores 6.5/10 overall, ranking #1275 of 1310 sedans in our database (better than 3% of the segment). Stronger-scoring alternatives exist at similar prices — use our compare tool before committing.
The 2014 Rolls-Royce Phantom starts at $266,000 and ranges up to $338,660 across trims (MSRP when new). At 10 MPG, expect roughly $5,250/year in fuel at 15,000 miles/year.
Other sedans at a similar price point, ranked by Carivo score.
Explore the full lineup of Rolls-Royce models scored by Carivo — ranked by overall score across reliability, safety, value, performance, and technology.