2016 Honda Pilot Base — Carivo review carivo.co
SUV

2016 Honda Pilot Base

Independent review & score by Carivo

Price Range $30,027–$39,325
Fuel Economy 15 MPG
Seating 7 passengers
Category SUV
Est. Annual Fuel $3,500/yr

Key Specifications — 2016 Honda Pilot Base

Seating Capacity7 passengers
Body StyleSUV
Base Price$30,027–$39,325

Source: EPA FuelEconomy.gov & manufacturer data. Figures reflect base trim; actual specs vary by trim level.

About the 2016 Honda Pilot Base

With an overall Carivo score of 7.7/10, the 2016 Honda Pilot Base earns a Recommended rating among the suvs we've scored. Its strongest dimension is Safety at 8.5/10, while Technology at 6.9/10 is where it trails the competition most noticeably. It's a solid all-rounder that delivers across most dimensions without obvious deal-breakers.

Reliability and safety are the two dimensions that matter most for long-term ownership costs. Reliability comes in at 8.2/10 in our assessment — above the middle of the pack for this class, though not flawless. Safety is a strength too — 8.5/10 by our scoring. As with any car, verify the official ratings for your specific trim at nhtsa.gov/ratings.

Performance lands mid-pack at 7.0/10: enough power and composure for everyday needs, without the dynamics that distinguish the segment's driver-focused options. Technology scores 6.9/10 — the infotainment and driver-assist features feel dated against current-generation rivals. This is worth weighing if you prioritize connected features or modern safety tech.

Priced from $30,027–$39,325, 15 MPG, seating 7, the Honda Pilot Base sits in the mid-market bracket of the suv segment. Value lands at 7.4/10 — you get what you pay for, no more and no less, with a few rivals offering slightly better per-dollar returns. At 10 years old, resale value, parts availability, and whether a successor model has improved on its weak points are all worth investigating before committing.

Bottom line: Think of the 2016 Honda Pilot Base as the dependable pick rather than the exciting one. Its softer scores in technology are the only real asterisks. Shoppers who value predictability over headlines will be well served.

Carivo scores are our own editorial assessment, informed by NHTSA safety and recall records, EPA fuel-economy figures, and manufacturer-published specifications. Scores are reviewed periodically and updated when new data becomes available. See our full methodology →

How It Ranks Among SUVs

The 2016 Honda Pilot Base ranks #564 of 2454 suvs in the Carivo database — better than 77% of the segment. Its 7.7/10 overall score is 0.3 points above the segment average of 7.4/10. Its $30,027 starting price undercuts the segment's median of $36,079 by about 17%.

Rankings are recalculated as new vehicles and scores are added. See the full SUV ranking →

Which Pilot Base Year Should You Buy?

Across the Pilot Base model years we've scored, the 2016 holds its position — we didn't find an older year that delivers similar scores for meaningfully less money.

YearScoreStarting price (MSRP when new)
2025 8.2/10$40,695 Read review →
2024 8.1/10$39,510 Read review →
2023 8.0/10$38,324 Read review →
2022 7.9/10$37,139 Read review →
2021 7.9/10$35,954 Read review →
2020 7.8/10$34,768 Read review →
2019 7.9/10$33,583 Read review →
2018 7.8/10$32,398 Read review →
2017 7.8/10$31,212 Read review →
2016 (this review) 7.7/10$30,027
2015 7.7/10$28,842 Read review →

Pros & Cons — 2016 Honda Pilot Base

✓ What it does well

  • Above-average reliability record with solid owner satisfaction data
  • Top-tier safety scores across crash tests and driver-assistance tech
  • Versatile body style handles daily commuting and weekend adventures equally well

✗ Where it falls short

  • Driving dynamics are adequate but uninspiring; not the choice for enthusiast drivers
  • Tech suite is functional but lags behind segment-best options; some features cost extra
  • Fuel economy at 15 MPG is low — running costs will add up quickly

More Honda Reviews

Explore the full lineup of Honda models scored by Carivo — ranked by overall score across reliability, safety, value, performance, and technology.