2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD — Carivo review Representative photo — may show another model year
Truck

2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD

Independent review & score by Carivo

Price Range $34,504–$42,116
Fuel Economy 10 MPG
Seating 5 passengers
Category Truck
Est. Annual Fuel $5,250/yr
The 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD scores 6.8/10 at Carivo, ranking #469 of 515 trucks and an estimated $5,250/year fuel cost.

Key Specifications — 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD

Seating Capacity5 passengers
Body StyleTruck
Base Price$34,504–$42,116

Source: EPA FuelEconomy.gov & manufacturer data. Figures reflect base trim; actual specs vary by trim level.

About the 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD

Our scoring places the 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD at 6.8/10 overall, which translates to a Good rating for this truck. Its strongest dimension is Technology at 8.7/10, while Safety at 6.9/10 is where it trails the competition most noticeably. It's a capable but unexceptional truck — stronger alternatives exist if you're willing to shop the segment carefully.

Reliability and safety are the two dimensions that matter most for long-term ownership costs. We score reliability at 7.6/10 — better than most direct rivals, if short of the segment's best. Safety is a notable gap at 6.9/10 in our scoring — below what the best in segment deliver. Check the official NHTSA ratings for the trim you're considering before deciding.

Performance scores 7.7/10 — competent for everyday use. Acceleration and handling are adequate for commuting and highway driving, though enthusiasts will want to look at higher-rated alternatives. The cabin tech earns 8.7/10 — infotainment, smartphone integration, and driver-assistance are all close to the best this class offers.

Priced from $34,504–$42,116, 10 MPG, seating 5, the GMC Sierra 2500HD sits in the mid-market bracket of the truck segment. The 7.4/10 value score says the pricing is fair rather than generous; cross-shop the segment before signing anything. At 10 years old, resale value, parts availability, and whether a successor model has improved on its weak points are all worth investigating before committing.

Our take: The 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD is a passable truck but not a standout one. Weaknesses in safety hold it back from being a strong recommendation. It may suit buyers with specific needs it serves well, but we'd encourage comparing at least two or three higher-scored alternatives before deciding.

Carivo scores are our own editorial assessment, informed by NHTSA safety and recall records, EPA fuel-economy figures, and manufacturer-published specifications. Scores are reviewed periodically and updated when new data becomes available. See our full methodology →

How It Ranks Among Trucks

The 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD ranks #469 of 515 trucks in the Carivo database — better than 9% of the segment. Its 6.8/10 overall score is 0.6 points below the segment average of 7.4/10. Its $34,504 starting price sits close to the segment's median of $35,138.

Rankings are recalculated as new vehicles and scores are added. See the full Truck ranking → · Best Trucks under $35k →

5-Year Cost Snapshot — 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD

Fuel (75,000 miles)~$26,250 ($5,250/year at $3.50/gal)
InsuranceVaries widely by driver and state — always quote the exact trim before buying

We only print costs we can compute from sourced data (EPA fuel economy, NHTSA recalls). We don't estimate maintenance or depreciation — anyone who gives you one number for those is guessing.

Which Sierra 2500HD Year Should You Buy?

Across the Sierra 2500HD model years we've scored, the 2016 holds its position — we didn't find an older year that delivers similar scores for meaningfully less money.

YearScoreStarting price (MSRP when new)
2025 7.3/10$46,762 Read review →
2024 7.2/10$45,400 Read review →
2023 7.1/10$44,038 Read review →
2022 7.2/10$42,676 Read review →
2021 7.1/10$41,314 Read review →
2020 7.0/10$39,952 Read review →
2019 7.0/10$38,590 Read review →
2018 6.9/10$37,228 Read review →
2017 6.8/10$35,866 Read review →
2016 (this review) 6.8/10$34,504
2015 6.7/10$33,142 Read review →

Pros & Cons — 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD

✓ What it does well

  • Above-average reliability record with solid owner satisfaction data
  • Competent performance that satisfies most everyday driving demands
  • Best-in-class infotainment, driver assistance, and connectivity features
  • Versatile body style handles daily commuting and weekend adventures equally well

✗ Where it falls short

  • Fuel economy at 10 MPG is low — running costs will add up quickly
  • Brand resale values vary — check current market data before committing

Common Questions — 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD

Is the 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD reliable?

We rate the 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD's reliability 7.6/10 — above the middle of the pack for this class.

Is the 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD worth buying?

It scores 6.8/10 overall, ranking #469 of 515 trucks in our database (better than 9% of the segment). Stronger-scoring alternatives exist at similar prices — use our compare tool before committing.

How much does the 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD cost?

The 2016 GMC Sierra 2500HD starts at $34,504 and ranges up to $42,116 across trims (MSRP when new). At 10 MPG, expect roughly $5,250/year in fuel at 15,000 miles/year.

Which Sierra 2500HD years should you avoid?

Based on our year-by-year scoring, the weakest Sierra 2500HD years we've rated are 2015 (6.7/10), 2017 (6.8/10), 2016 (6.8/10) — each at least half a point below the nameplate's best (7.3/10). See the full year table above before deciding.

Owner Essentials — GMC Sierra 2500HD

Practical extras owners actually buy. These are Amazon search links — as an Amazon Associate, Carivo earns from qualifying purchases at no cost to you.

All-weather floor mats → Dash cam → OBD2 scanner → Phone mount →

Get the Monthly Reliability Report

Once a month: which brands moved up or down our reliability rankings, new recalls worth knowing, and the smartest-money model years. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

More GMC Reviews

Explore the full lineup of GMC models scored by Carivo — ranked by overall score across reliability, safety, value, performance, and technology.